Journal Management System
 
Home  |   Add your Journal  |   Features  |   Journal List
Author Login | Reviewer Login | Editor Login
Search  

Acta Informatica Medica
Periodical of AVICENA, d.o.o., Sarajevo
Journal Home Page
ISSN: 0353-8109 (Print)
ISSN: 1986-5988 (Online)
Language: [ English ]  
News / Announcements

  » Volume 22, Issue 4
      pp. 228-287
  » Volume 22, Issue 3
      pp. 156-217
  » Volume 22, Issue 2
      pp. 84-146
  » Volume 22, Issue 1
      pp. 4-78

 

Open Access

Original Research



Assessment of Medical Records Module of Health Information System According to ISO 9241-10

Asghar Ehteshami, Farahnaz Sadoughi, Saeed Saeedbakhsh, Mahtab Kasaei Isfahani.

Abstract
Introduction: Hospital managers and personnel need to Hospital Information System (HIS) to increase the efficiency and effectiveness in their organization. Accurate, appropriate, precise, timely, valid information, and Suitable Information system for their tasks is required and the basis for decision making in various levels of the hospital management, since, this study was conducted to Assess of Selected HIS in Isfahan University of Medical Science Hospitals According to ISO 9241-10. Methods::This paper obtained from an applied, descriptive cross sectional study, in which the medical records module of IUMS selected HIS in Isfahan University of Medical Science affiliated seven hospitals were assessed with ISO 9241-10 questionnaire contained 7 principles and 74 items. The obtained data were analyzed with SPSS software and descriptive statistics were used to examine measures of central tendencies. Results: The analysis of data revealed the following about the software: Suitability for user tasks, self descriptiveness, controllability by user, Conformity with user expectations, error tolerance, suitability for individualization, and suitability for user learning, respectively, was 68, 67, 70, 74, 69, 53, and 68 percent. Total compliance with ISO 9241-10 was 67 percent. Conclusion: Information is the basis for policy and decision making in various levels of the hospital management. Consequently, it seems that HIS developers should decrease HIS errors and increase its suitability for tasks, self descriptiveness, controllability, conformity with user expectations, error tolerance, suitability for individualization, suitability for user learning.

Key words: Hospital Information System, Standard; Medical Records, Software, Assessment, ISO 9241



REFERENCES
1. Lippeveld T, Sauerborn R, Bodart C. Design And Implementing of Health Information System.Translation: Farzadfar, Farshad. et al. Tehran, Kelke Deerin Press, 2005: 1-2 [Persian].


2. Heywood A. Rhode J. Using Information for Action. Translation: Zare, Mohammad. Zahravi, Farahnaz. Tehran, Simindokht Press. 2005: 1-4 [Persian].


3. Tabibi J, Ebadi Azar F, Tourani S, Khalesi N. Total Quality Management in Health System. Tehran, Jahan Rayaneh press. 2001 [Persian].


4. Farshid P. Views of Medical Records Department Administrators and Medical Records Faculties Towards the Medical Records Graduated Participation in Hospital Information System development. Master Thesis in Medical Records Education Degree. Iran University of Medical Sciences. Tehran, Iran, 2002 [Persian].


5. Shahmoradi L. Developing a model for Hospital Information System Assessment. Master Thesis in Medical Records Education Degree. Iran University of Medical Sciences. Tehran, Iran, 2004 [Persian].


6. Backker AR, Ehlers CT, Bryant JR, Hammond WE. Hospital information systems: Scope-design-architecture. Amsterdam: B.V. publisher. 1992.


7. Aqajani M. Comparative and analytical Study of Hospital Information Systems. Journal of Teb o Tazkieh. 2002; 47: 29 [Persian].


8. Tanner M, Lengeler C. From the efficacy of disease control tools to community effectiveness. Transactions of the Royal Society of Tropical Medicine and Hygiene, 1993; 87: 518-523.

[
DOI via Crossref]   

9. Likourezos A, Chalfin DB, Murphy DG, Sommer B, Darcy K, Davidson SJ. Physician and nurse satisfaction with an Electronic Medical Record system. J Emerg Med. 2004; 27: 419-424.

[
DOI via Crossref]   
[Pubmed]   

10. Alipour J, et al. Users Views Aabout Seven Criteria of ISO9241/10 for Implemented HIS in Bandarabas Children's Educational Hospital. Medical Journal of Hormozgan. 2010; 14(2): 140-147 [Persian].


11. Alvarez RC, Zelmaer J. (1998) Standardization in health informatics in Canada. In: Cronholm Stefan, Goldkuhl Goran. Six generic types of information systems evaluation. The 10 th European Conference on Information Technology Evaluation (ECIT-2003), 25-26 September 2003, Madrid. Available from: http://www.ejise.com/volume6-issue2/issue2-art8-cronholm.pdf Accessed March 27, 2004.


12. Friedman C, Wyatt J. Evaluation methods in medical informatics. In: Wyatt Jeremy C., Wyatt Sylvia M. When and how to evaluation health information systems? {serial online}. International Journal of Medical Informatics. 2003 Mar, 69(2-3), PP 251-259. March 27, 2004, Available from: http://Sciencesdirect.com/sciences2ob=articeurl&udi=b617s48pm64w3&u. Accessed April 14, 2004.


13. Saeedbakhsh S, Sadoughi F, Ehteshami A, Kasaei Isfahani M. Assessment of Ability of User Education in Medical Records Module of Selected HIS in Isfahan Univrsity of Medical Sciences. Iranian Journal of Medical Education. 2011; 10(5): 877-885 [Persian].


14. Farahbakhsh M, Fozounkhah S, Hasanzadeh A, Houshian E, Khodaei N, Asemani N. Views of Health Planning Managers and Personnel About Health Information System in Tabriz University of Medical Sciences. Journal of Health System. 2007; 9(26): 15-22 [Persian].


15. Ebadi Azar F, Kahooyi M, Soleimani M, Ghazavi S. Hospital Information Computer network effects on Health Care Quality in Amirolmomenin Hospital's Wards in Semnan University of Medical Sciences. Journal of Health System. 2008; 11(31): 7-16 [Persian].


16. Anderson JG. Clearing the way for physicians' use of clinical information systems. Communications of the ACM.1997: 40; 83-90.

[
DOI via Crossref]   

17. Kimiyafar K, Moradi G, Sadooghi F, Sarbaz M. Views of users towards the quality of hospital information system in training hospitals affiliated to Mashhad University of Medical Sciences. Journal of Health Information Management. 2007; 4: 43-50 [Persian].


18. Habibi Koulaei, Hussein pour K, Mobashri E, Behnam pour N. The Hospitals Managers Awareness and Attitude about Hospital Information Systems Usage. Journal of Health Management. 2008; 10(30): 43-50 [Persian].


19. Kimiyafar K. A study on the views of users about the quality of hospital information system in training hospitals in Mashhad University of Medical Sciences. Tehran: Iran University of Medical Sciences and Health Services: 2006; 55 [Persian].


20. Moradi G, Sarbaz M, Kimiyafar K, Shafiei N, Setayesh Y. Hospital Information System Role in Sheikh Hospital Performance Improvement in Mashhad. Journal of Health Information Management. 2008; 5(2): 159-166 [Persian].


21. Abdelhak M, Grostick S, Hanken AM, Jacobs E. Health information: management of a strategic resource. 3rd ed. USA: WB. Saunders, 2007.

[
PMC Free Fulltext]   

22. Hamborg KC, Vehse B, Bludau HB. Questionnaire based usability evaluation of hospital information systems. Electronic Journal of Information Systems Evaluation. 2004; 7: 21-30.


23. Rashid Najafi F. Suitable Design: The Effective System for the All Users. Weekly journal of Standard: Internal Journal of Iranian Institute for Standard and Industrial Research. 2010; 982: 7 [Persian].


24. Maryam A, Rezaei-Hachesoo P, Shahmoradi L. Electronic health record: structure, content, and evaluation. Tehran: Jafari Publication; 2008 [Persian].


25. Lee F, Teich JM, Spurr CD, Bates DW. Implementation of physician order entry: user satisfaction and self-reported usage patterns. J Am Med Inform Assoc. 1996; 3: 42-55.

[
DOI via Crossref]   
[Pubmed]    [PMC Free Fulltext]   

26. Darbyshire P. User-friendliness of computerized information systems. Comput Nurs. 2000; 18: 93-9.

[
Pubmed]   

27. Ebadi Fardazar F, Ansari H, Zohour A, Marashi SS. Study of users' attitudes about the computerized hospital information systems (HIS). Payesh, Journal of The Iranian Institute For Health Sciences Research. 2007; 6: 11-18 [Persian].


28. Toromanovic S, Masic I, Novo A, Kudumovic M, Zunic L. Criteria how to Choose Adequate Methodology and Relevant Variables for Assessment of Quality of Primary Health Care. Med Arh. 2005; 59(1): 23-26.

[
Pubmed]   

29. Novo A, Masic I, Toromanovic S, Loncarevic N, Junuzovic Dz, Dizdarevic J. Family Registration Card as Electronic Medical Carrier in Bosnia and Herzegovina. Med Arh. 2004; 58(1, suppl. 1): 37-40.

[
Pubmed]   

30. Sabanovic Z, Masic I. Computerized Information System Support in Continous Quality Improvement in Hospital Care. Med Arh. 2001; 55(2): 113-116.

[
Pubmed]   

31. Masic I, Niksic D. Quality and Quality Assurance in Health Care. Med Arh. 2003; 57(3): 189-196.

[
Pubmed]   

32. Prnjavorac B, Ajanovic E, Masic I. et al. Y2K in Medical Practice. Med Arh. 1999; 53(3, suppl. 3): 13-14.

PMid:10870615

How to Cite this Article
Pubmed Style

Ehteshami A, Sadoughi F, Saeedbakhsh S, Isfahani MK. Assessment of Medical Records Module of Health Information System According to ISO 9241-10. Acta Inform Med. 2013; 21(1): 36-41. doi:10.5455/aim.2012.21.36-41



Web Style

Ehteshami A, Sadoughi F, Saeedbakhsh S, Isfahani MK. Assessment of Medical Records Module of Health Information System According to ISO 9241-10. www.scopemed.org/?mno=33675 [Access: October 22, 2014]. doi:10.5455/aim.2012.21.36-41



AMA (American Medical Association) Style

Ehteshami A, Sadoughi F, Saeedbakhsh S, Isfahani MK. Assessment of Medical Records Module of Health Information System According to ISO 9241-10. Acta Inform Med. 2013; 21(1): 36-41. doi:10.5455/aim.2012.21.36-41



Vancouver/ICMJE Style

Ehteshami A, Sadoughi F, Saeedbakhsh S, Isfahani MK. Assessment of Medical Records Module of Health Information System According to ISO 9241-10. Acta Inform Med. (2013), [cited October 22, 2014]; 21(1): 36-41. doi:10.5455/aim.2012.21.36-41



Harvard Style

Ehteshami, A., Sadoughi, F., Saeedbakhsh, S. & Isfahani, M. K. (2013) Assessment of Medical Records Module of Health Information System According to ISO 9241-10. Acta Inform Med, 21 (1), 36-41. doi:10.5455/aim.2012.21.36-41



Turabian Style

Ehteshami, Asghar, Farahnaz Sadoughi, Saeed Saeedbakhsh, and Mahtab Kasaei Isfahani. 2013. Assessment of Medical Records Module of Health Information System According to ISO 9241-10. Acta Informatica Medica, 21 (1), 36-41. doi:10.5455/aim.2012.21.36-41



Chicago Style

Ehteshami, Asghar, Farahnaz Sadoughi, Saeed Saeedbakhsh, and Mahtab Kasaei Isfahani. "Assessment of Medical Records Module of Health Information System According to ISO 9241-10." Acta Informatica Medica 21 (2013), 36-41. doi:10.5455/aim.2012.21.36-41



MLA (The Modern Language Association) Style

Ehteshami, Asghar, Farahnaz Sadoughi, Saeed Saeedbakhsh, and Mahtab Kasaei Isfahani. "Assessment of Medical Records Module of Health Information System According to ISO 9241-10." Acta Informatica Medica 21.1 (2013), 36-41. Print. doi:10.5455/aim.2012.21.36-41



APA (American Psychological Association) Style

Ehteshami, A., Sadoughi, F., Saeedbakhsh, S. & Isfahani, M. K. (2013) Assessment of Medical Records Module of Health Information System According to ISO 9241-10. Acta Informatica Medica, 21 (1), 36-41. doi:10.5455/aim.2012.21.36-41



Submit your manuscript
Register
Abstracting & Indexing
Instructions for Authors
Editorial Board
Aims & Scope
About this Journal
Sign up for TOC

ARTICLE TOOLS
Abstract
PDF Fulltext
Print this article Print this Article
How to cite this articleHow to cite this article
Export to
Export to
Related Records
 Articles by Asghar Ehteshami
Articles by Farahnaz Sadoughi
Articles by Saeed Saeedbakhsh
Articles by Mahtab Kasaei Isfahani
on IndexScholar Fulltext
on Google
on Google Scholar
Article Statistics
 Viewed: 1227
Downloaded: 276
Cited: 0




 




» For Authors




Become Reviewer


» Login Area






Follow ScopeMed on Twitter

ScopeMed Home
Job Opportunities/Service Offers
About ScopeMed
Terms & Conditions
Privacy Policy
Contact Us

The articles in Scopemed are open access articles licensed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/) which permits unrestricted, non-commercial use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the work is properly cited.
ScopeMed is a Service of SAGEYA Publishing for Scientific Publications. Copyright © ScopeMed® International Medical Journal Management and Indexing System.