Home|Journals Follow on Twitter| Subscribe to List

Directory for Medical Articles
 

Open Access

1

Int Surg J. 2016; 3(3): 1407-1413


The study of abdominal trauma: non operative and operative intervention and their outcome

Avadhesh M. Ramanuj, Hemang A. Panchal.

Abstract
Background: The aim was to study the cases of abdominal trauma in context of surgical intervention and criteria for non-operative and operative management, post-operative morbidity, mortality and final outcome.
Methods: The study of 50 cases of abdominal trauma, including blunt as well as penetrating trauma was conducted prospectively during the period of 23 months (January 2010 to November 2011). Patients of all age and sex who were admitted in our department after abdominal trauma were potential candidate for enrolment in this study and study was done in context to fulfill our aim.
Results: In our study, 4 (8%) patients had undergone conservative management while 46 (92%) patients were managed by operative intervention. Amongst the surgical procedures drainage of haemoperitoneum and haemostasis (n = 20, 43.47%) is commonly done procedure for abdominal trauma involving solid organs especially liver. However some splenic injury may warrant removal of spleen (n = 10, 21.79%). In small bowel perforation primary repair (n = 8, 17.39%) is the choice of procedure however resection anastomosis (n = 4, 08.69%) is necessary if multiple perforations are present in small segment. Post-operative recovery in this study was generally good with rate of complication as 8% (n = 4) and most of the complications were wound related (n = 04, 08%). we have observed mortality rate of 8% (n = 04) and persistent shock and haemorrhage (n = 3, 75%) is the most common cause of death in our study. The reason was extensive polytrauma involving massive injuries of spleen, liver, pancreas and kidney associated with thoracic injuries, orthopaedic injuries and cranio-cerebral injuries. The average hospital stay in our study was 9.26 days. Out of 50 abdominal trauma patients 46 (92%) has survived and shown good prognosis on follow ups. These data suggests that good outcome can be achieved if proper evaluation done and timely definitive treatment is given to the trauma victims.
Conclusions: From our study we can conclude that for “optimum outcome” of abdominal trauma through timely definitive treatment is of prime importance. Establishment of dedicated and efficient trauma care system is mandatory to achieve these goals in abdominal trauma management.

Key words: Surgical intervention, Patients



Share this Article


Advertisement
Archives of Clinical and Experimental Surgery (ACES)

SUBMIT YOUR ARTICLE NOW


ScopeMed.com
ScopeMed Home
Follow ScopeMed on Twitter
BiblioCAM
Author Tools
eJPort Journal Hosting
About ScopeMed
License Information
Terms & Conditions
Privacy Policy
Suggest a Journal
Publisher Login
Contact Us

The articles in Scopemed are open access articles licensed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0/) which permits unrestricted, non-commercial use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the work is properly cited.
ScopeMed is a Database Service for Scientific Publications. Copyright © ScopeMed® Information Services.
Scopemed Buttons